Just watched an interesting movie last night. I've been on a Francis Ford Coppola kick the past few weeks, so I picked up
The Conversation; I had heard of it before, but not a lot; just that it was a minor classic that was well-known to cinophiles. The fact that it came out the same year as
Godfather II must have something to do with its limited visibility. (though of course it was nominated for Best Picture that year, when
Godfather II won, so what do I know?) Leonard Maltin called it one of the best movies of the 70s, however, high praise considering that decade is one of the golden ages of Hollywood cinema.
Gene Hackman plays Harry Caul, a surveillance expert who has been hired to reco
rd the conversation of a young couple walking around in a crowded
San Francisco square. His mantra throughout the movie is "don't get involved"; he's not paid to care about who the people are or what they're talking about, or (most importantly) what might happen to them when their private conversations are heard by the people who pay him. All he cares about is making the best recording he can. It's part game and part obsession; he is interested in the challenge of figuring out how to make clean recordings without being discovered, but he is also obsessed with his own privacy, with always being The Watched instead of The Watcher.
Like any good piece of art, a discussion of this movie could go in any number of directions: questions of perspective and interpretation; the culpability of those who are 'just following orders' or 'just doing their jobs,' when the outcome of those actions lead to immoral acts; the unreliable narrator/protagonist, in this case one who descends further and further into delusional paranoia; even a Kafkaesque bureaucracy (mirroring the theme of personal responsibility) headed by a shadowy figure known only as "The Director." These are all interesting topics; a suitably inspired individual could write a book about this movie, with each of those themes composing its own chapter. For now I'm going to try to narrow in on the theme that I think is at the heart of the movie, that the other scenes eminate from, in a way.
The Conversation has often been compared to Hitchcock; it is a suspenseful psychological thriller in the vein of Vertigo (and one of its most famous scenes involves a large quantity of blood in an extremely white bathroom). One of the ways in which it most mirrors Hitchcock is the use of Watcher and Watched to represent movie audiences and (most specifically) movie directors. Hitchcock's two most widely acknowledged masterpieces are Vertigo and Rear Window, and both of them play extensively with this dynamic. Hitchcock called Vertigo his most autobiographical piece; it's a fascinating study in (among other things) controlling every aspect of a person; how they dress, move, speak...with being the director of a movie, in short.
The Conversation mirrors Hitchcock's themes most specifically in this way. (If you were to catch me in the right mood, I might even argue that the aesthetic choices that reflect Hitchcock's cinematography are included to point towards these more general thematic resonances.) Harry Caul is a perfect representation of the obsessive, reclusive filmmaker (Coppola himself?) who never wants to stand in front of the camera. His life is to create high quality recordings of other people, to pass on intimate details about their lives... but nobody in the movie knows anything about his own life and history, including the audience. The one scene in which we all (characters and audience) learn something of his history is also one that highlights his paranoia with being watched... this is an amazing, understated acting job by Hackman. We watch as he struggles to overcome his own paranoia and let himself be vulnerable, while at the same time realizing that, because of who he is and what he does, lowering his guard even for an instant will result in him compromising himself and his job.
Also of interest is the cast. A short list includes:
A VERY young Harrison Ford (five years before
Star Wars), who still manages to turn in one of the most menacing performances of his career:
Robert Duvall and Teri Garr in what amount to cameo roles:
Cindy "Shirley" Williams:
And the old Coppola favorite, Fredo himself, John Cazale, second-billed to the master Gene Hackman:
The pacing is slow at times, and there's this mime who desperately needs to get his ass kicked (if you don't know why everyone hates mimes, this movie will show you), but overall it's an intriguing movie that works on a lot of levels. AND it's pretty funny to see what passed for high-technology surveillance equipment in 1974. Well worth a peep.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home